Welcome to the Bar Council's blog page, where you will find
updates from the Chairman of the Bar and pieces from contributing
To view previous updates by the Chairman and the Chief Executive
of the Bar Council, click here. To view articles by
contributing writers, click here.
Rupert Jones, barrister at Citadel Chambers - Third Six
Pupillages: Time to regulate limbo land?
The third six pupil lives in an unregulated world between
pupillage and tenancy. Yet for hundreds of newly qualified
barristers, many with thousands of pounds of student debt, it's
their only option if they want to stay at the independent bar.
Typical third six pupils didn't secure tenancy, which may have
been for various reasons. Undeterred, they looked for other
chambers - probably on the Bar Council's website, which has a list
of third six vacancies. Such opportunities come up frequently in
all areas of law and at chambers of the highest repute.
The benefits for chambers are plain. You get to pick from a pool
of high quality applicants - in many cases exceptional candidates
whose hopes of securing tenancy were foiled only by an even more
exceptional candidate. You don't have to pay them an award. You can
use them to service your solicitors and do the work no one else
wants to do. You can even charge them chambers rent when they do
it. You don't have to give them a vote on chambers issues. Best of
all, you can decide whether to offer them tenancy at a time that
suits chambers, if at all.
All this leaves the third six pupil with none of the securities
of pupillage: no guaranteed fee (though some chambers do offer a
financial arrangement); usually little or no training or
supervision; and often no idea about their prospects of tenancy.
The only thing that differentiates them from a squatter, apart from
a slightly more appealing name, is the possibility of tenancy - and
even then that may be illusory.
Even the title 'Third Six Pupil' is misleading. They are neither
technically a pupil nor confined to a third six month period, as a
third six doesn't even have to last six months. Such arrangements
can last much longer, even years. Third sixers can even find
themselves moving to a third or fourth set of chambers and doing a
third third six.
The third six is a flexible thing and no doubt that fact makes
it all the more attractive to chambers, with the result that
opportunities are created that wouldn't exist if red tape
interfered with the process.
A third sixer is in a vulnerable position and at risk of being
exploited. They have little or no bargaining power. They are keen
to please and impress. They may be in a perilous financial state.
While the third six may be a voluntary agreement, the reality is
that third sixers have no real alternative if they are to hold on
to their chosen career.
The Bar Council's Third Six Pupillages Working Group's view is
that, to the extent that some reform of the system is in order,
that is something that the Bar should do for itself, rather than
waiting for regulation to be imposed. This is in tune with
the thinking of the Criminal Justice Reform Group, whose 2015
report recommended that the Bar Council issue guidance on Third Six
As a result, barristers' views are being sought on everything to
do with third six pupillages, including a 10 point list of good
practice and whether a name change from Third Six Pupillage
should be explored.
Rupert Jones, barrister at Citadel Chambers and a
member of the Bar Council's Third Six Pupillages Working
You can help by sharing your views. Should this area be
regulated? Should there be guaranteed earnings? Have you
experienced third sixers being exploited? Whatever your view, the
Bar Council Education and Training Committee would like to hear
from you. Please email Alex Cisneros: firstname.lastname@example.org or