Leveson's Independent Review of Criminal Courts

In 2024, the government announced Sir Brian Leveson would be undertaking an independent review of the criminal courts and provide recommendations to reduce the backlog of cases, which is now approaching 80,000, with trials being listed for 2030.

In July 2025, Part I (the policy review) of the ‘Independent review of the criminal courts’, by Sir Brian Leveson, commissioned by the Ministry of Justice was published. We welcomed the focus on diversion from the criminal justice system but warned against proposals to remove jury trials.

The government responded to part 1 in December 2025 and set out a package of measures, including the proposal to curtail jury trials in England and Wales for crimes that carry a likely sentence of less than three years.

Our position

  • We have continuously opposed proposals to curtail jury trials because there is no evidence that their removal would reduce the backlog nor has it been set out how an alternative system would be resourced. This change would compromise public trust and confidence in our criminal justice system
  • The criminal justice system and criminal Bar desperately need further investment, including match-funding criminal pupillages
  • The government should remove the cap on sitting days to ensure courts can work at full capacity to reduce the backlog
  • An immediate uplift of 15% to criminal prosecution and defence fees to provide enough publicly funded barristers to meet the demand
  • Criminal procedure rules should be amended to provide greater flexibility for hearings and to allow virtual courts which do not require a court room

Read a summary of our submission to the review

Read the latest government statement from December 2025: 'Swift and fair' plan to get justice for victims - gov.uk

Our work

Further resources

Our press releases

Bar leaders’ statement on government’s response to Leveson’s Review of Criminal Courts

The Bar leaders have issued a joint statement in response to the news the government plans to curtail the right to jury trials.

  • 4 December 2025
  • Press release

Bar Council urges government not to pursue changes to jury trial under mistaken belief that radical equals effective

The Bar Council has issued an initial response to the government's package of measures announced in response to Sir Brian Leveson's review of criminal courts. The Bar's representative body has warned that progress risks being undermined by proposals that compromise public trust and confidence in our criminal justice system through curtailing jury trials. 

  • 2 December 2025
  • Press release

Bar leadership joint statement on jury trials

The Bar leaders met following the leak of a government memo on the response to Sir Brian Leveson's report

  • 27 November 2025
  • News

Jury trials have not caused the criminal justice system crisis - Bar Council

The Bar Council has warned that curtailing the right to jury trials may result in a further lack of trust and confidence in our criminal justice system.

  • 25 November 2025
  • Press release

Bar Council welcomes increase to Crown Court sitting days but warns long-term investment is needed to reduce case backlog

"Continuing to limit the number of sitting days will mean the backlog is only being chipped away. To have an immediate and significant impact on the delays, there should be no limit to the number of days that courts can sit."

  • 1 October 2025
  • Press release

Leveson report: diversion welcome but no need to curtail trial by jury, warns Bar Council

Our initial response to Part I of the Independent review of the criminal courts

  • 9 July 2025
  • Press release

Spending Review is sign of listening to voices from the courts – Bar Council reaction

The Bar Council has welcomed the overall settlement for justice in the Spending Review.

  • 11 June 2025
  • Press release

New report reinforces perilous state of criminal justice, Bar Council says

A new report from the Institute for Fiscal Studies has found that Crown Court productivity had recovered to post-pandemic levels by the end of last year, yet the record high backlog continues to rise.

  • 6 June 2025
  • Press release

Year of the review: Bar Conference examines Bar’s culture, public inquiries and future of justice

Bar Conference will this year examine the Bar's culture, whether public inquiries deliver in the public interest, the future of justice and much more.

  • 29 April 2025
  • Press release

Investment in probation step in the right direction, Bar Council says

The Bar Council said the announcement recognises that we need a properly resourced regime that reduces crime and increases public confidence and safety in our justice system.

  • 13 February 2025
  • Press release

Juryless trials ‘not the answer’ to court crisis, barristers warn

The Bar Council has objected to the introduction of intermediate courts and made alternative recommendations, including a new model for diversion, in its submission to the Leveson review of criminal justice.

  • 6 February 2025
  • Press release

Criminal legal aid increase for solicitors: Bar Council reaction

The government has announced additional funding for criminal legal aid solicitors

  • 20 December 2024
  • Press release

Increasing court sitting days is the right decision

The government has announced an extra 2,000 sitting days

  • 18 December 2024
  • Press release

Bar Council reacts to Leveson review of criminal courts and latest court statistics

The figures out today show the perilous state of the criminal justice system. To address the multitude of challenges, we need new solutions and additional funding.

  • 12 December 2024
  • Press release

 

Blogs

Beware speed over safety: after the Leveson review

Tim Kiely explores what the next steps are for criminal justice following part one of the Leveson independent review of criminal courts.

Guest blog: How will restricting jury trial and reducing jury numbers affect the delivery of justice?

10 July 2020: Tana Adkin KC, barrister at Charter Chambers and member of the Bar Councils Retention Panel, looks in-depth at the many reasons why jury trials should not be tampered with